Author of post “Drama Queen: Priyanka Sharma (www.techtipspro.com blog)“has used definitive sense in almost every sentence and claims that it is author interpretation and analysis. Where as in whole post author tried to tell that only he knows truth and he/she is some kind of God who knows truth about past as well as Future.
Just have a look:
“They are quite good actors.”
Had author seen some movie or serial by these two, that he/she reaches final conclusion. If author is aware of such serial and movie then make that clear else take allegation back.
“There is no love lost between them. Their so called love for each other is a very well orchestrated drama to fool the gullible public. “
Another definitive sense. Thank God author does not fall under category of gullible public. Author is intelligent to judge love of others. Two people claim themselves to be in love, but author having some extra territorial senses definitely knows that this is not love.
“Even their families must have been persuaded to be part of this drama.”
Now author has links with family members also. Again if have proof then show us, else write a disclaimer that this is all your assumption.
“Priyanka’s main aim is the title, fame and prize money to be shared with Rajbeer.”
All other contestants were or are not there for prize money. Author’s favorite is still in show, without a partner, is not there for money. May be author’s favorite is actually heeling her wounds and waiting for her love in show. Again this sentence shows that author is 100% aware of what is going inside other persons mind.
“ Rajbeer was not seen to be selecting from among the 10 girls. He just interacted with Priyanka only and Priyanka interacted with him only which is highly suspicious.”
This is clear accusation. Never fall in love with one girl only and at least not with first one you meet.
“Most of the time Rajbeer's mother kept diplomatic silence and Rajbeer father's drama is also very suspicious.All these under the constraining atmosphere of the set up and in front of the nation. If he really did not like the developments, he could have discreetly called up the starplus authorities. He also seems to be part of this drama”.
We all knows that this is reailty show, coming on TV. Why to accuse Raj only .?All contestants under same constraints. Some were IIM return, some are directors. Why picking him only? Author favorite as already said, is still in show? For what reason? If she has been that much hurted in love, why she is not quiting. So donot just pick and choose. If Raj is guilty for this , then every contestant is.
“ His son being a very handsome man requires an exposure like this show to be noticed by modelling agencies and even bollywood.”
All knows Raj is handsome. All must have noticed him in first eight weeks also, there was no need to come back in show for just this reason.
“ She is only pretending that she loves Rajbeer and wants to marry him and Rajbeer also pretending. Even if they exchange rings or even if they marry, it is only for public consumption.”
This is again definitve sentence and here author not only judged about past, present but future also. May be tomorrow, we will see accuations like “ They consume marriage to make public fool”, “Priyanka gets pregnant to fool public else she just pretends to be in love with Raj."
So we see that in whole post author has not only accused contestants on basis of his presumptions but also tried to tell us that it is the only universal truth and those who donot agree fall under category of gullible( means easy to fool ) category.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Star Plus Perfect Bride: "Techtipspro.com Propaganda and alligations regarding Priyanka Sharma" Response
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
December 5, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Rudresh I don't follow that blog any more, but did when this one was posted. I do not know if you followed the comments. Almost hundred comments and at least two-thirds countered this post for being it's style. Assumptions can never be called truth. There was no analyses either, only stating s assumptions in the guise of truth.
I am happy someone gave an apt reply to the post.
December 5, 2009 at 2:35 PM
Calling whole populations (shows are telecast worldwide) gullible is height of audacity.
December 5, 2009 at 2:39 PM
"Getting engaged and then getting married with ceremonies, rituals and witnesses, and you are still fake"---gullible is the one who claims this!!! Not only gullible, an imbecile, moron.
Post a Comment